Putting Global Warming on Ice Essay

What makes the undercoats temperature rise and fall? Do glasshouse gases block solar heat from leaving the earth, or is it yet a product of solar bodily process? some nation nourish theorized on what causes temperatures to change. A catch phrase named Global Warming came to popularity. Environmentalists from all walks of look joined the orbiculate warming fight. According to Thomas OConnell the spheric warming delve wasnt accepted in the 60s and 70s when he studied it. It only became popular latterly in the 90s. E rattlingone believed that hu earths were causation a catastrophe by punching a whole into an ozone grade in the sky, letting psychic traumaful rays of sunlightshine in.People fought to shutd birth plants in order to stop the emissions of carbon dioxide and other(a) nursery gases. Everyone believed the orbicular warming claims coming from senators and environmentalists. Today in the twenty- commencement century, science has stepped up to disprove the com mon myths of orbiculate warming. umpteen of the theories and claims of world(prenominal) warming argon easily disproved with science. Science is the only tool that slew be used to tell whether theories ar fact or fiction. The first issue of spherical warming is the recent Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty k todaying to cut greenhouse emissions from successful countries.The international Kyoto protocol has been in debate for legion(predicate) years. The Kyoto protocol is an international treaty to reduce developed earths greenhouse emissions, specifically carbon dioxide, to 7% below their 1990 levels. As prexy Bush came to office he refused the U.S.s involvement in the treaty. President Bush wasnt even the humanity that killed the idea for the U.S. (National totality 2). A bill, stating that the U.S. wouldnt ratify whatsoever mode treaty that would harm the United States economically and would live with no consequences for developing or tertiary World countries, was passed with a unanimous 95-0 vote by the senate forward President Bush was elected (National Center 2). The treaty isnt rough global warming. It was de sign-language(a) in order to transfer success from developed nations interchangeable the U.S. to developing or struggling countries (Tuccille 2).Research decl atomic number 18s that China, India, and Brazil who are not modify by the Kyoto Protocol will addition their CO2 emissions by 16% to a greater extent than the United States even withoutthe Protocol in issuing (National Center 3). Proponents of the protocol confessed that the treaty would not assimilate the beneficial environmental impacts advertised and that the costs of implementation would be much higher than the in the public eye(predicate) had been told (National Center 1). U.S. economy would suffer if we agreed to partake in the Kyoto scheme. gun prices would increase by as much as 66 cents per gallon, galvanic costs would too increase up to 80%, energy int ensifier products such as chemicals, steel, paper, and cars would rise in price by as much as 15%. (National Center 2). The economy of the USA would be devastated, states Thomas OConnell. The minority income would be refuseed by approximately 10%, 864,000 African Americans as well as 511,000 Hispanics would be unemployed people (National Center 2).Oil and fuel used for farming would be taxed or restricted causing in a higher cost of producing and lower profits of products including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, hogs, and milk (Heartland add 2 and 3). Businesses taxed by the government for their emissions would depart in raising costs for their consumers (Heartland Institute 3). New regulations would be implement for automobiles making carpooling mandatory and would penalize owners of trucks and sports cars. The average household income would even slobber by about $2,700 (Heartland Institute 2).Even the un biased and credible sentence magazine bring upd, the campaign agains t global warming seemed to be over before it even started referring to the Kyoto Protocol (Tuccille 1). Are we prepared to disappear from the map in order to prevent 1 degree Celsius of warming for the next degree centigrade? One of the hot issues on global warming is that hu military personnel has had something to do with the temperature.Man-made emissions such as carbon dioxide move over been claimed to cause global temperatures to increase over the years. Ever since the industrial revolution in the 1940s man has continued to emit gases such as CO2 into the air. Many people claim that CO2 is what blocks heat from escaping the automatic teller machine. They also claim that mankind has poked a hole in something called the ozone layer, a protective layer above the nimbus that keeps harmful UV radiation out, which lets more solar rays in. How convenient. The fact is that 98% of these greenhouse gases are natural to the earth. Man has not emitted them and they are not pollutants. T hey are mostly water vapors and clouds (Zipperer 2). Does that with child(p) dangerous to you? The earthhas even cut down on the charge per unit of carbon dioxide emissions from the years 1973-1990 (Lindzen 1 and 2).Even if we did nominate a covey of CO2 in the air evidently the effects wouldnt be catastrophic. In the aside the atmosphere has had much more amounts of CO2 in it before without significant increases in temperature (Lindzen 4). Richard Lindzen, a professor of meteorology at MIT, claims that a doubling of CO2 in the earths atmosphere would only government issue in a 1 degree Celsius increase in global temperature (National Center 3). Another greenhouse gas is methane. Methane is more harmful than CO2 further will not increase significantly for another nose candy years if it continues at its current rate (Michaels 1). Many credible experts in the field of science make believe agreed that man is not responsible.Over 17,000 scientists from all over the world have signed a petition declaring that there is no convincing scientific attest that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future tense, cause catastrophic heating of the earths atmosphere and disruption of the earths climate (Heartland Institute 5). Even if there were significant cases of warming global temperatures the effects wouldnt be as tragic as everyone thinks.There are many benefits to the warming of the earth, as there are consequences. Warming on a global scale would have dramatic effects on animateness and climates. Some effects may be harmful but many of them are beneficial. Some ideas about global warming consequences are myths that are un wantly. Many people say that global warming is linked with the arise in tropical storms. Storms such as hurricanes coming from the southeast into Florida coasts have been getting stronger for many years, but in 1991 there was a drought of storms that ranged to 1995 . The amount and intensity fell way below the average, which suggests that these storms were not alludeed by the warming of the earth (Bible Believers 3 and 4). Others claim that sea levels have risen all over the world because the polar ice caps are slowly melting due to the warming. Tests have proven that temperatures at the poles are actually getting colder and that sea levels have been rising for centuries before we had any profess on the climate (Bible Believers 3).Former Vice President Al Gore spoke of diseases migrating due to climate warming. He spoke of diseases like the faint Plague and Cholera, which he believed werespread because of weather patterns. Rats, who spread the Black Plague, lived in twain warm and cold climates so they had no mind to migrate. His second example Cholera has been a problem in both warm and cold climates and can be easily treated by purifying the water we drink (Heartland Institute 9). Many people have never heard possible benefits of global warming before. Having a warm climate is very beneficial. Historically, very warm periods in time resulted in flourishing life such as plants, animals, and fish (Bible Believers 4).Even oversized amounts of CO2 can be beneficial. More CO2 in the atmosphere fuels plants, which makes more food for all walks of life. Vikings were once able to farm what is now a cold and icy Greenland (Zipperer 3). A warming of the earth would result in keen-sighteder growing seasons and would deplete world hunger and harvest-home failure (Robinson 3). Global warming wouldnt be all that bad, but we do not have a way to tell if there is or will be any warming because of the difficulty to signal the weather.In order to make predictions about weather, people have knowing computer models that estimate changes in weather patterns. The models are designed from past weather data and possible factors effecting the weather. What modelers do not know is that global weather is very hard to predict, maybe ev en impossible without the in good order understanding and tools for the job (Robinson 2). Factors such as clouds, precipitation, oceans, and the sun are misapprehend and often underestimated (Zipperer 2). Modelers also leave out possible advances in the future such as nuclear energy and the positive effect it would have on the environment (Lindzen 2). Our current technology isnt even secretive to being advanced enough.Errors in the data are equivalent to 50% (Lindzen 3). These computer models could not even predict weather from the past. While global temperatures have raised by .3 to .6 C over the past 100 years models have over predicted the increase to be from .7 to 1.4 C by the year 1990 (Heartland Institute 7). Climate modelers have even inputted their own bias into the data, shifting variables to what they want them to be. Climate modelers have been cheating for so long its almost become respectable, says Richard A. Kerr, a writer for Science magazine. hike investigate on the topic is necessary in order to accurately determine whether we have a problem or not.Many people of profession have studied global warming and what may affect the outcome of their results. When measuring from the surface global temperatures have increased by about .6 degrees Celsius with a .2-degree error, but parts of the United States including the southeast have cooled beautifully since the late 19th century (NOAA 2). For those 100 years of slight warming, 70% of it occurred before the industrial revolution in 1940 in which man began to emit gases into the air (Zipperer 2). The surface on and around the equator has remained plus or minus 1 degree Celsius of its current temperature for billions of years (Lindzen 4). Research has also been done to determine the affect on rising and falling temperatures. Scientists have found very close relations with solar activity from the sun and the current temperature patterns, which suggests that fluctuations in temperatures are out of ou r hands (NOAA 5). Satellites are the outdo way to determine global temperatures.They are unbiased and have only a 0.001-degree Celsius of error (Heartland Institute 6). These satellites have confirmed that there is no secern of global warming. If anything there is a slight modify in the atmosphere (National Center 3). Very reliable agencies have done their own research on global warming. Many scientists have tested the greenhouse theory carefully and have found that greenhouse warming isnt even occurring and that rising temperatures are do to different stages of solar activity (Robinson 1). In 1995 the IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, did not prove that gentlemans gentleman were affecting global temperatures (Heartland Institute 8). Their report, Climate Change, includes a statement, The balance of indicate suggests a discernible human influence on the global climate (Heartland Institute 8). Dr. Roy Spencer, a meteorologist and team leader of the NASA/Marshall S pace public life Center, quotes, The temperatures we measure from space are actually on a very slight downward trend since 1979 the trend is about 0.05C per decade cooling (Heartland Institute 7).In a recent poll only 17% of the meteorological society and the American Geophysical Society believe that global warming is a product of man (Bible Believers 2). Representatives from the Environmental Protection delegation are threatening to withdraw their support from a global warming study done by the government. They have said that the report has an original/alarmist tone and that it does not appear to fairly reflect the scientific literary works and the historical record(Torres 1). The representatives claimed that the report also had scientifically inaccurate statements about the potential implications of climate change for air pollution and human (Torres 1 and 2). Usually, in scientific law, if a hypothesis fails through experimentation it should be discarded, but the theory of glo bal warming and greenhouse gases as a result of man is still considered substantial hypothesis even though it has been proven to be unlikely (Robinson 2).The debate of global warming may continue on for many years to come. Mankind may never see any rising in global temperatures, but nevertheless it will be speculated. Thomas OConnell At this moment in time there has not been any reliable and convincing evidence that the globe is dangerously warming. Global temperature is a product of natural variables that affect the earth. Man has little if any influence on this temperature. Many of the greenhouse claims have been poorly researched and have yet to be proven credible. hopefully in the future science will prevail and provide the original answer. Until then, people interested in global warming should do research of their own in order to formulate their own opinion. Life on earth has varyed or evolved to the environment. The earth will never adapt or change due to a single species th e earth is far too powerful. As this paper comes to a close a quote sums up the main idea. Thomas OConnell once said, As the empty words of the proponents gives way to real problem or is this phenomena more closely cerebrate to political agendas. Ill wait for the science.