Abortion Economics 101 :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

stillbirth Economics 101 There was a constant debate somewhat the approval ratings for President Bill Clinton in the midst of the sex scandal. At times the ratings were higher than notwithstanding before news of the scandal broke. Every peerless concur that the high ratings were linked to the strong economy. Herein lies the truth. After all, Americas strong economy wasnt built on presidential scandals, but on spontaneous abortion. The greatest economic fear right is the possibility of ending abortion, and the champions of abortion happen to be President Bill Clinton and the Democratic Party bingle should recall that the economy of the pre-Civil War South was built on the backs of slaves. They feared abolition, even to the point of going to war, because their whole economy would collapse without slavery. They certainly would not be able to keep the same standard of reinforcement. Today we puzzle a similar situation. The present economy has been built on the backs of pulsel ess babies and those who support abortion fear that its abolition ordain mean that they will not be able to keep the same standard of living that they have grown accustomed to. Is it fair for me to make this dramatic postulate? Consider the following and decide for yourself. Imagine a family with two children, one in 7th grade and one in 10th. Mom and dada both work, he earns 60% of their income and she earns 40 %. Mom becomes pregnant. The first bare is whether she can or will continue to work after the ball up is born. If she quits, this means a 40 % cut in income right murder the top. Even if she can continue to work, now there are quintet people to support quite of four three to send to college instead of two and a child living at home for xviii more years instead of five. Now consider the res publica as a whole. In the last 25 years we have killed third of all babies before they were born. Without abortion, whatever resources and income we have as a nation would hav e to be spread around over 35 meg more citizens not to mention the babies the 16- to 25-year-old women would have had by now. Think of the added terms for the programs being touted now by the president in education, day care, wellness care, energy usage, etc.